Chelsea Clinton – the Woman Who Used Embezzled Haiti Disaster Cash to Pay for Her Wedding – Lectures Trump on Haiti

On Thursday afternoon President Donald Trump asked a group of pro-amnesty senators why the US should welcome migrants from “sh*tholes” like Haiti, Central America or African nations.

It was a good question.

But Democrats, liberal media and global community were outraged that the president would use such an offensive term to describe the global community’s failed states.

Chelsea Clinton decided this was a good time to lecture Trump on Haiti.

Chelsea Clinton reportedly used stolen money from Haiti relief to pay for her extravagant wedding.

 

Chelsea Clinton – the Woman Who Used Embezzled Haiti Disaster Cash to Pay for Her Wedding – Lectures Trump on Haiti

Emasculating Of Men: Are skirts the next men’s fashion trend?

In an era during which rules seem meant to be broken — and more and more people are calling for gender equality — it should surprise no one that the fashion world is the head cheerleader for change. Case in point: the Fall 2018 Menswear designers presenting a variety of skirts on their runways.

A wrap skirt paired with a matching jacket showed up at the Astrid Andersen show in London, as well as a flasher-worthy trench dress at Alex Mullins, and a a flirty full skirt bounced along at Bobby Abley.

Then, Undercover presenting a plethora of pleated maxi skirts in Florence. Designer Jun Takahashi opened with five looks ranging from minimalist monochromatic to grungy, head-to-toe plaid. But the literal showstopper was the finale: a parade of topless men in white maxiskirts.

Don’t expect many men to embrace that style — but it’s definitely a talker for our times.

 

https://nypost.com/2018/01/12/are-skirts-the-next-mens-fashion-trend/

 

 

Male Feminist Comedian Aziz Ansari Accused Of Sexual Assault

Male Feminist Comedian Aziz Ansari Accused Of Sexual Assault

 

Actor, comedian, and self proclaimed male feminist Aziz Ansari is the latest actor to face sexual assault allegations by a woman who claims the assault was “by far the worst experience with a man I’ve ever had.”

Women’s lifestyle vertical Babe published an interview on late Saturday with a pseudonymous 23-year-old woman named “Grace,” who alleges that Ansari sexually assaulted her on their first and final date when she was 22.

The publication was able to corroborate her claims by cross-referencing the phone number from which his text messages were sent to a public registry.

Grace told the publication that after dinner the couple went back to his place when he immediately started groping her. The details of the encounter are graphic—escalating from aggressive kissing to oral sex, which she says she felt aggressively pressured into performing. Although she did not say “no,” Grace did not offer enthusiastic consent.

Babe states:

She says Ansari began making a move on her that he repeated during their encounter. “The move he kept doing was taking his two fingers in a V-shape and putting them in my mouth, in my throat to wet his fingers, because the moment he’d stick his fingers in my throat he’d go straight for my vagina and try to finger me.” Grace called the move “the claw.”

Ansari also physically pulled her hand towards his penis multiple times throughout the night, from the time he first kissed her on the countertop onward. “He probably moved my hand to his dick five to seven times,” she said. “He really kept doing it after I moved it away.”

But the main thing was that he wouldn’t let her move away from him. She compared the path they cut across his apartment to a football play. “It was 30 minutes of me getting up and moving and him following and sticking his fingers down my throat again. It was really repetitive. It felt like a fucking game.”

The alleged victim says she used “verbal and non-verbal cues” to indicate her distress and lack of consent, and that she even turned stiff at one point to indicate her displeasure at his Ansari’s alleged advances.

“I know I was physically giving off cues that I wasn’t interested,” said Grace. “I don’t think that was noticed at all, or if it was, it was ignored.”

Following the uncomfortable foreplay situation, Grace says she went to wash up and collected herself. When she went back, he allegedly asked if she was okay. She told Babe that she was at first happy with his reaction to her call to slow things down, and then he asked her to just chill on the couch with him.

She says the unexpected happened when she went to sit down with him and Ansari allegedly resumed pressuring Grace into having sexual intercourse with him—first making her perform oral sex again, and then bending her over in front of a mirror in a different part of the apartment to initiate coitus.

“I just remember looking in the mirror and seeing him behind me. He was very much caught up in the moment and I obviously very much wasn’t,” Grace said. “After he bent me over is when I stood up and said no, I don’t think I’m ready to do this, I really don’t think I’m going to do this. And he said, ‘How about we just chill, but this time with our clothes on?’”

They got dressed, sat side by side on the couch they’d already “chilled” on, and he turned on an episode of Seinfeld. She’d never seen it before. She said that’s when the reality of what was going on sank in. “It really hit me that I was violated. I felt really emotional all at once when we sat down there. That that whole experience was actually horrible.”

Grace says that while the TV played, Ansari once again made motions to be aggressive toward her, allegedly kissing her and sticking his fingers down her throat and moving to undo her pants. At this point, she says she turned away and being in a “different mindset,” she was able to ward off his aggressive advances.

“I remember saying, ‘You guys are all the same, you guys are all the fucking same.’” Ansari asked her what she meant. When she turned to answer, she says he met her with “gross, forceful kisses.”

At this point, Grace says she stood up and got her things and said she’d call herself an Uber. Ansari gave her a hug and allegedly went in for another aggressive kiss, which she pulled away from.

“I cried the whole ride home. At that point I felt violated. That last hour was so out of my hand,” she said.

A day after the encounter, Ansari texted Grace to tell her it was “fun meeting you last night,” but later apologized, claiming he “misread things in the moment.”

 

 

Can’t Afford Medical Treatment? Oregon Says You Should Consider Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia and assisted suicide advocates throughout the world advocate for laws along the lines of those in place in the state of Oregon, claiming that they are well designed to only apply to dying patients with no hope of recovery. It was the model for the recently passed law in Victoria, and was much discussed in Britain.

It is also being promoted in Sweden, where assisted suicide is currently being discussed. According to Fabian Stahle, a Swede who opposes euthanasia, activists “explain to us Swedes that the Oregon practices are protected by strict safeguards which only allow people with an incurable and irreversible illness that will, within reasonable medical judgement, result in death within six months.”

In his report, Oregon Health Authority Reveals Hidden Problems with the Oregon Assisted Suicide Model ​Mr Stahle challenges the assumption that the Oregon system is “robust, well-proven and well-researched system that does not show any vulnerability to the development of a slippery slope.”

What does “incurable” mean here?

In a series of questions to the Oregon Health Authority, Mr Stahle drilled into how an “incurable and irreversible disease” which will “result in death within six months” is actually defined. He asked, “Is this rule interpreted as “without administration of life-sustaining treatment”?

Craig New, Research Analyst, Oregon Health Authority, Center for Public Health Practice, Public Health Division, answered in the affirmative, saying “…your interpretation is correct. The question is: should the disease be allowed to take its course, absent further treatment, is the patient likely to die within six months?”

Thus, Oregon defines a disease as being incurable even if it can be treated, meaning a far larger group of patients qualifies for medically assisted death than just the extreme cases for which the law was originally said to apply.

Diabetes

Digging deeper, Mr Stahle found that the Dignity With Dying Act (DWDA) applies to people with any chronic illness who is likely to die within six months if they receive no treatment.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

Q) If a patient with a chronic disease (for instance, diabetes) by some reason decides to opt out from the life-sustaining medication/treatment and by doing so is likely to die within 6 months, thereby transforming the chronic disease to a terminal disease—does he/she then become eligible to take use of the act?

A) Interesting questions. While this is not addressed specifically in the law, the answer in both cases is yes—those patients would qualify. The law is best seen as a permissive law, and states only that patients must have a terminal illness with six months or less to live. It does not compel patients to have exhausted all treatment options first, or to continue current treatment. It is up to the patient and doctor to discuss disease and treatment options. But if the patient decides they don’t want treatment, that is their choice.

Life in the hands of insurers

Shockingly, Mr Stahle also found that the act would apply not only for patients who choose not to receive treatment, but who can’t afford it. In answer to a question about happens if the patient’s healthcare provider/insurer is not willing to pay for treatment or medication which would extend their life beyond six months, Mr New replied: “Patients suffering from any disease (not just those that typically qualify one for the DWDA) may not be able to afford some treatments or medication, and may choose not to pursue some treatments or take some medication for personal reasons. This is the patient’s decision and the law does not compel them to do otherwise. If the patient does not receive treatment or medication (for whatever reason) and is left with a terminal illness, then s/he would qualify for the DWDA. I think you could also argue that even if the treatment/medication could actually cure the disease, and the patient cannot pay for the treatment, then the disease remains incurable.”

In Nevada, cases have already emerged of insurers refusing to fund life-saving treatment, but offering to pay for euthanasia.

The Oregon deception

As Mr Stahle concludes: “Proponents want to sell the Oregon model along with the assurance that medically-assisted suicide only applies to dying patients where all hope is lost. But it is completely misleading. Surely vulnerable people in Sweden and all over the world deserve better than laws with such inherent dangers hiding beneath the surface?”

LifeNews Note: Courtesy of SPUC. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children is a leading pro-life organziation in the United Kingdom.

 

http://www.lifenews.com/2018/01/12/cant-afford-medical-treatment-oregon-says-you-should-consider-assisted-suicide/

‘Feminist’ Natalie Portman Wants Child Rapist Roman Polanski Pardoned

“I saw the feminist movement cover up for PEDOPHILES”

– Sara Fernanda Giromin

 

Natalie Portman is a total feminist. For instance, at the Golden Globes, she wore all black, signaling that it’s “Time’s Up” for sexual harassment in Hollywood. And she made it clear while she was presenting the award for Best Director how uncool it was that only men (gross) were nominated.

The appearance of it all is lovely, of course. But Portman, like the rest of her Hollywood cohorts righteously decked-out in all black, is a phony.

It appears that Ms. Portman only cares about some instances of sexual misconduct, or that people merely believe she cares, since the actresses signed a petition calling for child rapist Roman Polanski to be pardoned.

Portman signed the petition created in 2009 by France’s Bernard Henri Levy, which called for the release of the director. Other Hollywood elites, such as Harrison Ford and Emma Thompson (before she eventually removed her name) also lent their signatures.

Polanski, as you might recall, pleaded guilty to child rape in 1978 and has been accused of sexual misconduct by at least five women.

“The incident which sparked the long battle took place in 1977, when Polanski had unlawful sex with 13-year-old Samantha Gailey at actor Jack Nicholson’s Hollywood home,” reported the BBC in 2009. “The film-maker was arrested and charged with a string of offences, eventually admitting to having sex with a minor. The other charges were dropped as part of a plea bargain.”

But, remember, Portman wore all black and bashed men while the cameras were rolling, so she’s still a feminist. Or something.

H/t NewsBusters

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/25812/feminist-natalie-portman-wants-roman-polanski-amanda-prestigiacomo