“I saw the feminist movement cover up for PEDOPHILES”
– Sara Fernanda Giromin
Natalie Portman is a total feminist. For instance, at the Golden Globes, she wore all black, signaling that it’s “Time’s Up” for sexual harassment in Hollywood. And she made it clear while she was presenting the award for Best Director how uncool it was that only men (gross) were nominated.
The appearance of it all is lovely, of course. But Portman, like the rest of her Hollywood cohorts righteously decked-out in all black, is a phony.
It appears that Ms. Portman only cares about some instances of sexual misconduct, or that people merely believe she cares, since the actresses signed a petition calling for child rapist Roman Polanski to be pardoned.
Portman signed the petition created in 2009 by France’s Bernard Henri Levy, which called for the release of the director. Other Hollywood elites, such as Harrison Ford and Emma Thompson (before she eventually removed her name) also lent their signatures.
Polanski, as you might recall, pleaded guilty to child rape in 1978 and has been accused of sexual misconduct by at least five women.
“The incident which sparked the long battle took place in 1977, when Polanski had unlawful sex with 13-year-old Samantha Gailey at actor Jack Nicholson’s Hollywood home,” reported the BBC in 2009. “The film-maker was arrested and charged with a string of offences, eventually admitting to having sex with a minor. The other charges were dropped as part of a plea bargain.”
But, remember, Portman wore all black and bashed men while the cameras were rolling, so she’s still a feminist. Or something.
Save for the plumbing downstairs, men and women are exactly the same; any differences in interests or abilities are merely constructed by society and have nothing to do with how we are hard-wired. This is what we’ve been told ad nauseam by third-wave feminists.
This is all nonsense, of course. And anyone being honest, even those hard-line feminists, understands this, regardless of how much they might protest publicly.
Buttressing what we already know intrinsically and via basic observation, a science journal called “Brain Structure and Function” recently published findings from a study that showed sex differences in the anatomy of the brain present in just one-month-old babies.
(By the way, if someone can explain to me how society “constructed” such differences in these infants’ brains, I’d be all ears.)
“Using high-resolution structural MRI, we measured subcortical gray and white matter brain volumes in a cohort (N = 143) of 1-month infants and examined characteristics of these volumetric measures throughout this early period of neurodevelopment,” reads the study’s abstract. “We show that brain volumes undergo age-related changes during the first month of life, with the corresponding patterns of regional asymmetry and sexual dimorphism. Specifically, males have larger total brain volume and volumes differ by sex in regionally specific brain regions, after correcting for total brain volume.”
The study also states that their findings suggest such brain differences are “present at birth.”
“Our results complement a growing body of work investigating the earliest neurobiological changes associated with development and suggest that asymmetry and sexual dimorphism are present at birth,” says the abstract.
Still, the Left will continue to conflate equality with sameness and put women at a disadvantage by advocating for nonsensical things like transgender “women” competing against biological women in sports.
The Party of Science, ladies, gentleman, and third-gender options.