Mom’s controversial ban on husband bathing daughters: ‘I just don’t feel comfortable’

A mother has sparked outrage online after she explained that she wasn’t comfortable with her husband bathing their daughters because they “have different body parts.”

The Australian woman, whose identity we are keeping anonymous, posted her thoughts on social media, where she explained why she felt dads shouldn’t wash their young girls.

Originally reported in the Mail Online, the woman wrote: “So hubby is upset with me because I have told him that I don’t [want him to] wash our two daughters in the bath or shower. I just don’t feel comfortable for a man to do this.”

She continued: “I have said I don’t have any issues with him bathing our son as well, he’s a boy.”

“I just believe that girls should be getting washed by their mothers and boys get the same from their fathers.”

“It’s just got to do with the fact that mom and daughters have the same parts, same goes for men and their sons.”

The woman went on to explain that her husband was offended by the suggestion but that it was just how she has always done things.

She said: “People play the ‘I was molested card’ so very often these days, I just don’t want in any way to give my kids the chance to even think about that.”

The controversial post was met with a mixed response from other social media users, but the majority of readers disagreed with her point of view.

One said: “You have more than a few screws loose, you shouldn’t even be thinking like that putting your partner in the same category as a child sex predator.”

While another added: “This post says a lot about how you see yourself and your negative way of life.”

And another agreed: “Sad how you tell your husband not to bathe his own kids.”

A fourth person pointed out the potential issues this rule would pose in a single-parent family.

They said: “What about single parents? Should they not bath their son or daughters in case they molested them?”

Yet ANOTHER rape case disgrace: Man, 26, has his conviction quashed after spending two years in jail after bombshell Facebook messages missed by police prove his innocence

A man who spent more than two years in jail for a rape he did not commit had his conviction quashed after a relative took only a minute to uncover a series of bombshell Facebook messages – missed by police – that proved his innocence.

In the latest rape case to highlight failings in the criminal justice system, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that the jury at Danny Kay’s 2013 trial was only shown doctored transcripts of crucial Facebook chats between Mr Kay and his accuser.

In an exclusive interview with the MoS, Mr Kay said archived versions of the original messages – proving he had consensual sex with his accuser – were found by his sister-in-law, Sarah Maddison. When she showed the Facebook exchange to the officer in charge of the investigation, he said: ‘How did you know how to find the messages and we didn’t?’

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook