In light of the long awaited revelations of sexual abuse in Hollywood finally being reported ESPONDA PRODUCTIONS presents AN OPEN SECRET for free for a limited time . A film about the sexual abuse of children in the entertainment industry in Hollywood. Please support our efforts of raising awareness by sharing with your friends and colleagues. #AnOpenSecret #BeCourageous #ReportIt #LifeGetsBetter. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook @AnOpenSecret.
Radical feminism and “progressive” ideology laid the foundation for the widespread sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment that finally is coming to light.
The inspiration behind the Women’s March on DC, Linda Sarsour, has been accused of enabling the alleged sexual assault and harassment of a woman who worked for the feminist activist, according to the victim and two sources directly familiar with the matter.
Allegations of groping and unwanted touching were allegedly brought to Sarsour during her time as executive director of the Arab American Association. In response, Sarsour, a self-proclaimed champion of women, attacked the woman bringing the allegations, often threatening and body-shaming her, these sources alleged. The most serious allegations were dismissed, Asmi Fathelbab, the alleged victim told The Daily Caller, because the accused was a “good Muslim” who was “always at the Mosque.”
“She oversaw an environment unsafe and abusive to women,” said Fethelbab, a former employee at the Arab American Association. “Women who put [Sarsour] on a pedestal for women’s rights and empowerment deserve to know how she really treats us.”
Fathelbab is a 37-year-old New York native and was raised in a Muslim household. She was excited in 2009 to begin working at the Arab American Association of New York as a contractor. At the time, Sarsour was the executive director of the organization. Fathelbab worked for Sarsour for almost a year, according to employment documents reviewed and authenticated by TheDC.
Fathelbab claims the Arab American Association was an unsafe workplace where she was allegedly sexually assaulted, body-shamed and intimidated.
Oftentimes, Sarsour was directly involved, according to the ex-staffer’s account.
The problems began in early 2009 when a man named Majed Seif, who lived in the same building where the Arab American Association offices are located, allegedly began stalking Fathelbab.
“He would sneak up on me during times when no one was around, he would touch me, you could hear me scream at the top of my lungs,” Asmi Fathelbab tells TheDC. “He would pin me against the wall and rub his crotch on me.”
Asmi claims one of Majed’s alleged favorite past times was sneaking up on her with a full erection.
“It was disgusting,” she tells The Caller. “I ran the youth program in the building and with that comes bending down and talking to small children. You have no idea what it was like to stand up and feel that behind you. I couldn’t scream because I didn’t want to scare the child in front of me. It left me shaking.”
The Daily Caller was provided with a link to Seif’s Facebook page and confirmed his identity, location and employment.
Fathelbab says she went to leadership at the organization to report the sexual assault. She alleges she was dismissed by Sarsour outright. “She called me a liar because ‘Something like this didn’t happen to women who looked like me,’” Asmi says. “How dare I interrupt her TV news interview in the other room with my ‘lies.’”
The official website of the United States District Court of Nevada states:
“The cornerstone of the Amercian judicial system is the trial courts … in which witnesses testify, juries deliberate and justice is done.”
– William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States
If that is the case, why are there paintings of birds raping people displayed at the Las Vegas Courthouse?
According to Redoubt News:
These paintings were hung in the very front of the courthouse, next to the main entrance. (…) These are reportedly created by local high school students. Their teacher said to one of the complainants, “They are learning that they don’t identify people by their faces.”
The article states that nobody at the courthouse took responsibility for okaying these paintings.
A closer look at these paintings reveals that their message goes way beyond “Don’t identify people by their faces” (whatever that means). Indeed, the paintings are replete with imagery and symbolism relating to Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) and trauma-based mind control (known as Monarch Programming). They tell a disturbing story of abuse at the hand of extremely evil people, which leads me to doubt that those were made by high school students.
Here are the paintings. Warning: Graphic imagery.
In occult symbolism, a unicorn is a phallic symbol (emphasized by its single horn). In ancient myths and legends, it is said that the unicorn can “only be tamed by a virgin”.
Is the unicorn (named Evil King) violating virgins?
These paintings are strikingly similar to the art of Kim Noble, a Monarch programming survivor.
The series of paintings on display at the Lloyd George Federal Courthouse appear to tell a horrific story of ritual abuse. The main handler is represented by a unicorn (a phallic symbol) who is named “Evil King”. More abuse is committed by birds with human bodies. The fact that the abusers are animals probably alludes to the fact that dissociated slaves have little to no contact with reality. In all of the paintings, the slaves appear completely out of it or passed out.
These slaves are represented as faceless figures wearing masks, representing their core personality being replaced by an alter persona created by the handlers. The masks worn by the slaves resemble those worn in masked balls à la Eyes Wide Shut, where elite individuals partake in ritualistic copulation.
The aim of Monarch programming is to cause trauma so intense that it forces slaves to dissociate from reality as a natural defense mechanism. The paintings at the Las Vegas Courthouse depict exactly this process using disturbing symbolism.
Why are these horrific paintings displayed at a government building dedicated to law and justice?
Pizzagate because Clinton. Involves the Clinton Foundation and HAITI.
Barry Sherman and his wife Honey – Canadian billionares re Apotex Pharmaceuticals – were found hanged in their home by a realtor. Police are investigating. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5185511/Canadian-police-probe-suspicious-death-billionaire.html
The Shermans were under investigation for a liberal fundraiser scandal. https://globalnews.ca/news/3030352/liberal-fundraisers-being-investigated-by-lobbying-watchdog/
HAITI CONNECTION! Clinton connection: https://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2017/12/16/who-killed-barry-and-honey-sherman-and-why/ “Sherman was one of the most powerful and highly-connected men in North America and was perhaps most well-known for securing a deal with the Clinton Foundation during to provide vaccines in Haiti. In September 2014, in response to the spread of the chikungunya virus in Haiti, Apotex worked with the humanitarian organization Direct Relief to donate more than $2.2 million in medical aid to the country. Apotex struck a deal with the Clintons’ Direct Relief organization to provide drugs to treat victims of the virus, saying in a statement: “Apotex is in a position to help (in Haiti), and we are delighted to work with Direct Relief…” Apotex worked with Direct Relief in Haiti, who was a “particularly active” member of the Clinton Foundation/Clinton Global Initiative community, supporting post-hurricane “relief efforts” there. The huge pharmaceutical company airlifted vaccinations and medical supplies into Haiti that was funded through charitable donations to the Clinton Foundation and other connected charities.”
According to the Health and Human Rights Journal https://www.hhrjournal.org/2013/08/a-one-time-only-combination-emergency-medicine-exports-under-canadas-access-to-medicines-regime/ there is a clear connection between Apotex and the Clinton Foundation
Read the article but this is the pertinent part
MSF had been conducting talks with a number of developing countries to encourage them to make use of the mechanism, but all efforts had been unsuccessful until Apotex was put in touch with the Clinton Foundation, which led Apotex to Rwanda.70
In discussion with MSF, developing countries reported that they did not wish to self-identify because of pressure from pharmaceutical firms and the World Bank.71 Unless a country self-identifies, generic firms are not able to obtain a voluntary or compulsory license, so the process stalls. For months, until Rwanda came forward, it appeared as if no drugs would ever be produced under CAMR. In fact, facilitation by the Clinton Foundation followed on that foundation’s discussion with the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network at the 2006 XVI International AIDS conference in Toronto regarding use of the legislation
Here’s a photo of the pool where they were found. Those railings don’t seems like and effective choice for a noose. Also weird coincidence with discussion of Vanderbilt pool https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2294089 which actually began in this thread yesterday – which is the day the Shermans were found dead. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2291627
or scroll through photos here to find it https://www.remax.ca/on/toronto-real-estate/na-50-old-colony-rd-na-crea_id18892572-lst/
A liberal editor who bashed the GOP just got fired for alleged sexual harassment, according to a Friday report.
Stephen Henderson, the managing director of opinion and commentary at The Detroit Free Press and a Pulitzer Prize Winner, was fired for alleged sexual misconduct, the outlet reported. Henderson is accused of sexual harassment to women over the years following the results of an internal investigation.
“This is a devastatingly sad day for us at the Free Press. Stephen is a magnificent journalist and a treasured colleague who has done so much for Detroit,” said Free Press editor and Vice President Peter Bhatia. Henderson won a Pulitzer Price in 2014.
One day prior to Henderson’s termination, he wrote an op-ed for the Free Press, bashing the GOP and saying, “The party is willing to indulge just about any repugnant point of view in a candidate or public official – racism, religious discrimination, disrespect for the Constitution – in order to achieve its political aims.”
No further details on the types of abuse were given, due to protecting the privacy of the accusers.