Racist White Feminist Reporter Who Cried Sexism On Cam Newton Now Forced To Apologize For Her Racist Tweets

 

 

The female sports reporter who implored Cam Newton to apologize for ‘belittling’ her with sexist remarks earlier this week offered her own apology on Thursday as racist tweets she wrote four years ago emerged.

Jourdan Rodrigue, 25, said there was ‘no excuse’ for the 2012 and 2013 tweets in which she used the n-word and revelled in her father’s ‘racist jokes about Navajo land’.

In a Twitter statement, she said: ‘I apologize for the offensive tweets from my Twitter account 4/5 years ago.

 

‘There is no excuse for them or the sentiment behind them. I am deeply sorry and apologize’.

In the first tweet, Rodrigue, who is a reporter for the Charlotte Observer, said: ‘The earth moves at 450 + mph thats (sic) 10 times triller than nascar dale earnharts a b**** n***a.’

 

In the second and third, she said: ‘My dad is being super racist as we pass through Navajo land. He’s the best. Racist jokes the whole drive home.’

Her apology coincided with Newton’s who finally, after being dropped from an endorsement deal with the yogurt company Dannon, said sorry for telling Rodrigue a day earlier: ‘It’s funny to hear a female talk about routes’.

The Carolina Panthers quarterback made the comment at a press conference on Wednesday in front of other reporters.

Rodrigue was outraged by the remark and took to Twitter afterwards to complain.

‘I don’t think it’s funny to talk about routes. I think it’s my job,’ she said.

She claimed to have sought Newton out in the locker room after he made the comments but said he offered no apology for them.

‘This afternoon, I did my job as an NFL beat writer and asked Cam Newton a question about one of his receivers.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4955704/Cam-Newton-reporter-apologizes-racist-tweets-sent.html

 

 

Euthanasia is Murder: Majority of Quebec caregivers approve killing dementia patients, even without consent

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/majority-of-quebec-caregivers-approve-killing-dementia-patients-even-withou

 

MONTREAL, Quebec, October 5, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — A majority of caregivers in Quebec support euthanasia for patients with Alzheimer’s or dementia, even if the patients had not previously signed an advance directive.

According to a recent survey, ninety-one percent of 302 caregivers surveyed said they favored euthanasia for people with dementia who were in the terminal stage of the illness, showed signs of distress, and had signed an advance directive to be euthanized, reported the Montreal Gazette.

But as many as seventy-two percent still supported euthanasia for dementia patients, even when the patients had not signed an advance directive.

The survey was performed by University of Sherbrooke epidemiologist Dina Bravo. Some dozen chapters of the Quebec Federation of Alzheimer’s Groups assisted by collecting data.

“This story chills me to my bones,” responded American anti-euthanasia activist Wesley Smith in the National Review.

The disease “can be far worse on the caregiver than it is on the afflicted, who often don’t remember their worst moments,” wrote Smith, who cared for his mother, an Alzheimer’s patient, in his home for five months before her death.

“Anyone who doesn’t see the potential for caregivers working to put the patient out of their own misery, is ignoring the foibles of human nature,” he said.

Neither Quebec’s nor Canada’s euthanasia law allows advance directives for euthanasia.

Quebec’s Bill 52 stipulates a person requesting death by lethal injection must do so “in a free and informed matter,” reported the Gazette.

But that may change.

Advance directives may come soon

Quebec’s Liberal Health Minister Gaetan Barrette tasked a parliamentary commission in March to begin consultations on advance directives.

Barrette, who expects the consultations to last about a year, said the time was right because more people in the province than expected had asked to be killed by lethal injection.

“As a doctor and a minister, I think that Quebeckers are ready,” he told Canadian Press.

Ten months after the province’s euthanasia law took effect in December 2015, Barrette expressed surprise that the number of people requesting to be killed by euthanasia was three times higher than he anticipated.

There were 461 reported euthanasia killings in Quebec in the first year it was legal, the CBC reported in March.

When announcing the panel on expanding euthanasia, Barrette also referred to the case of 56-year-old Michel Cadotte.

The Montreal man was charged in February with second-degree murder after allegedly smothering his wife, 60-year-old Jocelyn Lizotte, with a pillow in a nursing home.

Lizotte suffered from Alzheimer’s. Her nephew told CBC the family’s request that she be euthanized was refused.

The charge against Cadotte, whose trial was in July, was used in the media to spark debate on allowing advance directives.

When Quebec wanted to legalize euthanasia in 2014, the government classified it as a “health service” and therefore it fell under provincial jurisdiction, noted Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention.

If Quebec again acts unilaterally to expand euthanasia by allowing advance directives, the federal Liberals could choose to look the other way, he told LifeSiteNews.

But it appears that the federal Liberals are themselves looking to expand euthanasia.

They asked the Council of Canadian Academics to set up a panel and report by 2018 on advance directives, as well as euthanasia for children, and solely for mental illness.

The danger of advance directives for degenerative diseases like dementia is “you can’t change your mind now because you’re incompetent,” Schadenberg said.

With medical directives, people will often change their minds and opt for treatment they earlier said they wouldn’t want, he pointed out. “You can’t revert from death. Once you’re dead, you’re dead.”

Moreover, the crucial question becomes “who decides” that the conditions for euthanasia an individual consented to in advance have been met, Schadenberg said.

Indeed, the Telegraph reported in January a Dutch woman who signed an advance directive to be euthanized “at the right time” was held down by her family as she fought to stop her doctor, who had decided the time was right, from lethally injecting her.

The doctor was cleared of wrongdoing under the Dutch euthanasia law.

Moreover, there’s also clear evidence doctors in the Netherlands and Belgium are killing people without their consent even though “it’s not technically legal,” Schadenberg said.

A 2015 survey of doctors showed more than 1,000 people in the Flanders region of Belgium were euthanized without consent in 2013, he told LifeSiteNews.

Similarly, in January 2017 the Netherlands released its report of 2015 euthanasia deaths, which documented 431 people killed by lethal injection without their consent.

“If you look at that data and you analyze that data, you realize that nearly all of those deaths were people who were in a coma and had dementia,” Schadenberg told LifeSiteNews.

“Once you legalize euthanasia, you’re giving the power over life and death over to doctors, or in Canada, doctors and nurse practitioners” who may “view your life as not worth living,” he said.

“Now we’re placing the value that someone holds for my life into the balance of whether or not I live or die. That’s a ridiculous situation,” added Schadenberg.

That “suffering due to Alzheimer’s disease sometimes falls heavier on caregivers than on patients” and that caregiving “can be exhausting and heartbreaking, and sometimes perilous to the caregivers’ health” cannot be ignored or sugar-coated, writes Smith.

“But allowing caregivers to order doctors (or nurses) to end the patient’s life is a bridge too far,” he points out.

“If a society is judged by the way in which it treats its most vulnerable citizens, we will reject the killing agenda and focus our efforts on mitigating suffering and promoting better care.”

Democrat Mega-Donor Harvey Weinstein Accused Of ‘Decades’ Of Sexual Harassment

another day another liberal democrat male outed as creepy abuser of women

 

Hollywood producer – and Democratic mega-donor – Harvey Weinstein, has been involved in eight separate sexual harassment lawsuits, according to an expose published by the New York Times Thursday, and has paid out millions in settlements over a span of decades.

Weinstein, the paper says, has a history of bizarre behavior, allegedly offering women who work for him a career boost in return for sexual favors.

In at least one case, a female employee claimed Weinstein “badgered” her into allowing him to give her a naked massage, leaving her “crying” and “distraught.” In another, Weinstein reportedly told a female colleague to meet him for breakfast at a hotel, but then redirected her to his room, where he appeared in a bathrobe and asked her to watch him shower.

These encounters – which included “unwanted physical contact” – led to several lawsuits, and Weinstein has settled at least eight of those over the course of three decades, stretching all the way back to 1990, but as recently as 2015, the paper says.

This is undoubtedly bad news for Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who relied on Weinstein for thousands of dollars in campaign donations across their careers. In the last cycle alone, Weinstein gave nearly $100,000, through a series of small-bore donations, to both the Hillary Victory Fund as well as major left-leaning organizations supporting the Democratic nominee’s campaign.

 

http://www.dailywire.com/news/21993/democrat-mega-donor-harvey-weinstein-accused-emily-zanotti